Category: AI Visibility Insights

When AI chatbots answer questions, they often include links to websites as sources. But how many links does each AI model typically cite? We analyzed over 400,000 responses from the last month across 7 major AI platforms to find out.

The results show big differences between models. Some AI platforms cite many sources, while others cite few or none. Understanding these patterns helps brands know where to focus their content efforts.

How Many Links Does Each AI Model Cite on Average?

Based on data from over 400,000 analysis results collected in the last month, here’s how many links each AI model cites per response – when it includes sources:

• Grok: 43.21 links per response
• ChatGPT: 25.08 links per response
• AI Mode: 13.78 links per response
• Perplexity: 10.00 links per response
• Gemini: 7.27 links per response
• Google AI Overviews: 7.24 links per response
• Copilot: 4.75 links per response

When AI models do include sources, they often cite many of them. Grok leads with over 43 links per response when it includes sources. ChatGPT averages 25 links per response when it cites sources, showing it’s not shy about including multiple references when it does provide them.

What Percentage of Responses Include Links?

Not every AI response includes links. Here’s what percentage of responses from each model include at least one source link:

• Perplexity: 98.67% of responses include links
• AI Mode: 91.99% of responses include links
• Copilot: 85.18% of responses include links
• Google AI Overviews: 75.92% of responses include links
• Grok: 70.17% of responses include links
• Gemini: 54.86% of responses include links
• ChatGPT: 35.00% of responses include links

This reveals an important pattern: Perplexity and AI Mode include links in almost every response, making them consistent citation opportunities. ChatGPT, despite citing many links when it does include them, only includes links in about one-third of its responses. This suggests ChatGPT is selective about when to provide sources.

What Do These Numbers Mean for Your Brand?

These citation patterns matter because they show where your content has the best chance of appearing. If a model cites many links, there are more opportunities for your website to be included. But it also means more competition for those spots.

For example, when Grok includes sources, it averages over 43 links per response, creating many citation opportunities. However, with so many links, each individual link gets less attention. ChatGPT’s pattern is different: when it does include links, it averages 25 per response, but it only includes links in about 35% of responses, making those citations more selective and potentially more valuable.

According to research from Search Engine Journal, citation patterns in AI responses directly impact website traffic. Brands that appear in AI citations often see increased organic traffic from users clicking through to learn more.

Why Do Some Models Cite More Links Than Others?

Different AI models have different approaches to providing sources. Some models are designed to show many sources to give users multiple perspectives. Others focus on fewer, higher-quality sources.

Grok’s high citation count (43+ links when sources are included) likely comes from its design to show diverse viewpoints. The platform aims to present many sources so users can explore different angles on a topic. This aligns with research from TechCrunch showing that Grok emphasizes source diversity in responses.

Perplexity takes a different approach: it includes links in nearly 99% of responses, but averages 10 links per response when it does. This makes Perplexity the most consistent citation opportunity. ChatGPT shows a more selective pattern: when it includes links, it averages 25 per response, but it only includes links in about 35% of responses overall. This matches findings from Nature that show ChatGPT prioritizes quality and relevance when deciding whether to include sources.

How Can You Optimize Content for Each Model?

Understanding citation patterns helps you tailor your content strategy. Here’s how to approach each model:

For High-Citation Models (Grok, ChatGPT, AI Mode, Perplexity)

These models cite many sources when they include links, so there are more opportunities to get included. Focus on:

• Creating diverse content: These models look for multiple perspectives, so cover different angles of your topic
• Building authority: Even with many citations, these models still prefer authoritative sources
• Optimizing for specific queries: With more citation spots, you can target niche topics where you have expertise

For Consistent Citation Models (Perplexity, AI Mode, Google AI Overviews)

These models include links in most of their responses (75-99%), making them reliable citation opportunities. Focus on:

• Creating comprehensive content: These models prefer in-depth, well-researched pages
• Establishing expertise: Show clear author credentials and original research
• Optimizing technical signals: Ensure your site has proper schema markup and clear structure, as noted in Google’s structured data guidelines

For Low-Citation Models (Gemini, Copilot)

These models cite fewer sources, making each citation more valuable. Focus on:

• Becoming the definitive source: Create content that’s clearly the best resource on a topic
• Demonstrating expertise: Show why your content is more authoritative than competitors
• Targeting high-value queries: Since citations are rare, focus on topics where being cited has the most impact

What Does This Mean for Your SEO Strategy?

Traditional SEO focuses on ranking in search results. AI SEO (also called GEO – Generative Engine Optimization) focuses on getting cited in AI responses. These citation patterns show that AI SEO requires a different approach than traditional SEO.

As Search Engine Journal explains, AI models don’t rank pages the same way search engines do. Instead, they select sources based on relevance, authority, and how well content answers specific questions.

The citation data shows interesting patterns: models like Perplexity and AI Mode include links in almost every response, making them consistent opportunities. Grok includes links in 70% of responses but averages 43 links when it does, creating many citation spots. ChatGPT is more selective, including links in only 35% of responses, but when it does, it averages 25 links, suggesting those citations are carefully chosen.

Key Takeaways

Understanding citation patterns helps you make smarter decisions about where to focus your content efforts:

• Grok cites the most sources (43+ per response when links are present), offering many opportunities but more competition
• ChatGPT cites heavily when it includes sources (25 per response), but only includes links in 35% of responses, making those citations more selective
• Perplexity and AI Mode include links in most responses (99% and 92% respectively), making them the most consistent citation opportunities
• Gemini and Copilot cite fewer sources (7 and 5 per response when links are present), making each citation more valuable
• Content strategy should vary by model based on both citation frequency and average links per response

By tracking which models cite your content and how often, you can optimize your strategy for maximum visibility across AI platforms.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many links does ChatGPT cite per response?

Based on data from the last month, when ChatGPT includes links, it averages 25.08 links per response. However, ChatGPT only includes links in about 35% of its responses, making it more selective than models like Perplexity that include links in nearly every response. When ChatGPT does cite sources, it includes many of them, suggesting careful selection of multiple authoritative references.

Which AI model cites the most sources?

Grok cites the most sources when it includes links, averaging 43.21 links per response. This is significantly higher than other models. Grok is designed to show diverse perspectives, which explains why it includes so many source links. However, it’s worth noting that Perplexity includes links in 98.67% of responses (compared to Grok’s 70.17%), making Perplexity the most consistent citation opportunity overall.

How can I get my website cited by AI models?

To get cited by AI models, create high-quality, authoritative content that directly answers common questions. Use clear headings, proper schema markup, and demonstrate expertise. Focus on topics where your brand has unique insights. Track which models cite your content to understand what’s working.

Do more citations mean more traffic?

Not necessarily. Models that cite many sources (like Grok) may drive less traffic per citation because users have more options. Models that cite fewer sources (like ChatGPT) may drive more traffic per citation because each link gets more attention. The value depends on both the number of citations and how users interact with them.

How often do AI models update their citations?

AI models can update their citations frequently as they crawl and index new content. However, the exact frequency varies by model. Some models may update weekly, while others may update more or less frequently. Regular content updates and monitoring help ensure your content stays relevant.

Should I optimize for all AI models or focus on specific ones?

It depends on your goals and audience. If you want maximum visibility, optimize for models with high citation rates like Grok. If you want high-value citations, focus on selective models like ChatGPT. Many brands use a balanced approach, creating content that works well across multiple models while tracking which ones drive the most traffic.

This post was written by Spotlight’s content generator.

As artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini grow more powerful, websites face new challenges and opportunities. One important tool for websites is the llms.txt file—a simple, standardized text file designed to help AI understand and use website content better. This guide explains what llms.txt is, why it matters, how it’s being adopted, and best practices for creating one. It also shows how platforms like Spotlight lead the way in making websites more visible in AI chat conversations.

What Is llms.txt and Why Was It Created?

llms.txt is a file placed in a website’s root directory (similar to the well-known robots.txt file). Its purpose is to provide clear, structured information specifically for large language models and AI agents. Unlike regular HTML or sitemap files, llms.txt is meant to be both machine-readable and human-friendly.

The idea behind llms.txt is to help AI systems better understand the website’s purpose, key resources, and content structure. This helps reduce errors or “hallucinations”—when AI gives wrong or misleading answers—and improves the accuracy of responses that mention your site.

The concept is still fairly new and evolving, but it was created in response to how AI models increasingly rely on web content to answer user questions and provide recommendations. By offering a standardized file, website owners can guide AI to their most important content and clarify usage terms.

How Does llms.txt Work in Practice?

When an LLM or AI agent visits a website—either to crawl, index, or fetch data—it looks for files that help it understand the site. If llms.txt is present at the root URL (for example, https://get-spotlight.com/llms.txt), the AI reads it to get:

• A summary of what the website offers and who it serves
• A list of key pages with descriptions (like documentation, blog, or API)
• Metadata such as content update dates or version numbers
• Optional instructions or license terms for using the content

This information helps the AI decide which parts of the site are most relevant to a user’s query. It improves the chances the AI will cite the site correctly and with helpful context.

For example, if a user asks an AI about the API of a cloud service, the AI can quickly find the API reference page from the llms.txt file, rather than guessing or relying on incomplete data.

Example of a Well-Formatted llms.txt

Here is a sample llms.txt file based on best practices recommended Anthropic, who established the standard:

# Spotlight - Brand Visibility in AI Conversations

## What is Spotlight?

Spotlight (get-spotlight.com) is a SaaS platform that helps brands monitor, measure, and improve their visibility within AI chat conversations. Spotlight tracks how brands appear across major AI platforms and provides actionable insights to improve AI-generated visibility.

## Supported AI Platforms

Spotlight currently monitors 8 major AI platforms:
- ChatGPT
- Google AI Overviews
- Google AI Mode
- Grok
- Gemini
- Claude
- Perplexity
- Copilot

## Core Capabilities

### Prompt Discovery & Analysis
Spotlight discovers the most searched prompts that brands would want to appear in—queries their potential customers ask when searching for products or services the brand offers. Prompts are grouped by topics aligned with the brand's marketing objectives, and Spotlight measures each prompt's search volume to help prioritize actions.

### Weekly Monitoring
All discovered prompts are sent to all 8 AI models weekly using local IPs to get geographically relevant responses. This ensures brands understand how they appear to users in different regions.

### Brand Mention Analysis
Spotlight analyzes AI responses to:
- Identify brand mentions across all platforms
- Evaluate sentiment around brand mentions
- Compare positioning against competitors
- Track visibility rankings over time

### Citation & Source Tracking
The platform captures and analyzes:
- All citations and data sources used by AI models in their responses
- The queries ChatGPT uses to fetch fresh data from the web
- How often each piece of brand-owned content is cited by each model over time
- What types of websites each model prefers to cite

### Competitive Intelligence
Spotlight provides:
- Visibility rankings showing how brands compare to competitors
- Sentiment breakdowns for brand mentions
- Analysis of what makes high-visibility brands successful
- Reverse engineering of successful content strategies

### Content Optimization
Spotlight includes tools to improve visibility:
- Content grading system that evaluates existing webpages
- Optimization guidance for both technical and content aspects
- Gap analysis identifying prompts where brands don't appear
- Content suggestions that directly address missing prompt coverage

### Traffic Attribution
Spotlight integrates with Google Analytics to:
- Track traffic coming from LLMs
- Identify which LLM drove the traffic
- Show which pages received LLM traffic
- Close the loop between AI visibility and actual website traffic

### Reputation Monitoring
Spotlight has a dedicated section for brand reputation on AI chatbots:
- Sends prompts directly asking models about brand quality, value, and key metrics
- Analyzes and scores how the brand is perceived by each model
- Includes data sources used by models, allowing users to manage negative inputs

## Use Cases

- Marketing teams monitoring brand visibility in AI search results
- SEO professionals optimizing for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
- Brand managers tracking reputation across AI platforms
- Content teams creating AI-optimized content
- Competitive intelligence professionals benchmarking against competitors
- Product teams understanding how their offerings are described by AI

## Target Audience

Spotlight is designed for:
- Brands seeking to improve visibility in AI-generated responses
- Marketing teams focused on GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)
- Companies monitoring how AI platforms present their brand
- Organizations optimizing content for AI citations
- Businesses tracking competitor positioning in AI conversations

## Technology

Spotlight is built by AI agents, enabling rapid development of new features and adaptation to the fast-changing landscape of AI search and visibility.

For more information, visit https://get-spotlight.com

Why Are More LLMs and AI Tools Starting to Use llms.txt?

Adoption of llms.txt is growing as AI developers realize the benefits of structured site info. Several reasons explain this trend:

• Improved Accuracy: AI models that access llms.txt can reduce hallucinations by relying on verified site descriptions.
• Efficient Data Access: AI can quickly focus on relevant pages rather than crawling the entire site.
• Better User Experience: End users get more precise answers with proper citations.
• Standardization: Having a common file format simplifies integration across different AI platforms.

Currently, only 2 LLMs are official using llms.txt – Claude and Grok. However the rest of the LLMs are considering reading the file when analyzing a website. Server logs show evidence that ChatGPT is accessing the llms.txt files, but there is no evidence that the files’ content is currently considered in OpenAI’s responses.

What Are the Best Practices for Creating an Effective llms.txt File?

Creating a useful llms.txt file means balancing clarity, completeness, and usability. Here are expert recommendations:

1. Where and How Should You Place the File?

• Put llms.txt in the root directory of your website (https://yourdomain.com/llms.txt).
• Use plain text format, but include Markdown-style headings and bullet points for readability.
• Ensure it’s accessible without login or special permissions.
• Set content-type HTTP header to text/plain.

2. What Should the Structure and Content Include?

• Header/Title: One-line description of the website.
• Summary: 2-4 sentences explaining site purpose, audience, and offerings.
• Key Resources: List of important URLs with short, clear descriptions.
• Metadata: Dates, version numbers, content types (tutorial, reference, blog).
• Optional Sections: Sitemap link, contact info, license terms, update frequency, special instructions.

3. How Should You Write the Content?

• Be concise but informative.
• Prioritize your most valuable pages first.
• Avoid marketing fluff or vague language.
• Don’t list every page—focus on key content.
• Use absolute URLs, not relative ones.

4. What Are Technical Tips to Remember?

• Keep file size small (under 100KB).
• Update regularly to reflect site changes.
• Use proper HTTP headers.
• Add a “last updated” timestamp.

5. What Should You Avoid?

• Avoid listing internal or private URLs.
• Skip broken or outdated links.
• Don’t use the file to manipulate AI outputs unethically.
• Avoid excessive promotional language.

What Is the Current State of llms.txt Adoption Across AI Models?

Adoption of llms.txt is still in early stages but growing steadily. Here’s what we know from industry observations:

• ✅ Claude: Actively supports llms.txt as part of its web browsing and citation process.
• ✅ Grok: Considers llms.txt for content prioritization.
• ❌ ChatGPT: Not currently using llms.txt , however server logs show their bots accessing the file.
• ❌ Perplexity: Not currently using llms.txt.
• ❌ Gemini: Not currently using llms.txt .
• ❌ Google AI Overviews: Not currently using llms.txt.
• ❌ Google AI Mode: Not currently using llms.txt.
• ❌ Microsoft Copilot: Official not currently using llms.txt.

While most models do not yet fully support it today, it is likely to see growth in adoption in the near future.

How Can Website Teams Create and Maintain an Effective llms.txt File Step by Step?

Follow these steps to build a strong llms.txt file:

1. Plan Your Content: Identify your site’s main purpose, target audience, and key pages.
2. Write a Clear Header and Summary: Keep it simple and informative.
3. List Key Resources: Choose your top pages (documentation, blog, API, etc.). Write concise descriptions.
4. Add Metadata: Include dates, version info, and content types for clarity.
5. Include Optional Details: Sitemap URL, contact info, usage license, update notes.
6. Format Using Plain Text and Markdown Style: Use headings, bullet points, and line breaks.
7. Place the File at Your Root URL: Upload to https://yourdomain.com/llms.txt.
8. Set HTTP Headers: Ensure content-type is text/plain.
9. Test Accessibility: Check that AI crawlers and humans can access the file.
10. Update Regularly: Review and revise as your site changes.

What Are Some Authoritative Views on the Importance of Structured Files Like llms.txt?

AI and SEO experts emphasize that structured site metadata is critical for AI-powered search and discovery.

John Mueller, a Webmaster Trends Analyst at Google, has stressed the importance of clear site structure and metadata for search engines to understand content. While not specifically about llms.txt, his insights apply: “Structured data helps search engines and AI better understand your site, which can lead to better visibility and user experience.”

Additionally, researchers at Stanford University’s AI Lab highlight that AI systems benefit significantly from explicit, standardized signals about content origin and purpose to reduce misinformation.

These expert opinions underline why tools like llms.txt will become a standard part of website optimization in the AI era.

FAQ

What is the difference between llms.txt and robots.txt?

robots.txt tells search engine bots which pages to crawl or avoid, mainly to control indexing. llms.txt provides structured, descriptive information to help AI language models understand and use your website content better. Both live in the root directory but serve different purposes.

How does llms.txt reduce AI hallucinations?

By giving AI clear, authoritative descriptions and links to key resources, llms.txt helps prevent the AI from guessing or inventing answers based on incomplete data. This leads to more accurate and trustworthy AI responses.

Can I generate llms.txt files automatically?

You can copy the example in this post as a reference, add a description of your website, and have an LLM generate a llms.txt file automatically. However, manual review and customization ensure the file accurately reflects your site’s content and strategy.

Should llms.txt replace sitemaps or structured data?

No. llms.txt complements sitemaps and structured data by providing a human-readable, AI-focused overview. Use it alongside other SEO tools for best results.

How often should I update my llms.txt file?

Update it whenever you make significant changes to your website’s content, structure, or key resources. At minimum, review quarterly to keep it current.

Does Spotlight support llms.txt optimization?

Yes. Spotlight offers insights and recommendations related to llms.txt as part of its comprehensive AI visibility platform. It tracks how LLMs use site information and suggests improvements to maximize AI-driven traffic and brand mentions.

Conclusion

llms.txt is an emerging but powerful tool that helps websites communicate clearly with AI language models. It provides structured, concise information that improves AI understanding, reduces errors, and boosts your site’s chances of being cited accurately. Adoption is growing among major AI platforms, making it an important part of future-proofing your website for AI-driven search.

Brands and website owners looking to lead in this space should consider creating and maintaining a strong llms.txt file. Platforms like Spotlight offer advanced support for monitoring and optimizing AI visibility, helping brands stay ahead in this fast-evolving landscape.

By following best practices for llms.txt, you can help AI systems find, understand, and use your content effectively—enhancing your brand’s presence in the AI-powered web of tomorrow.

References

• Google Search Central – robots.txt specifications
• Stanford AI Lab
• John Mueller, Google Webmaster Trends Analyst, Twitter
• Anthropic Blog on Claude AI https://www.anthropic.com/blog
• OpenAI API Documentation https://platform.openai.com/docs

Want your YouTube videos to show up when people ask ChatGPT or Google AI Overviews questions? You’re not alone. As more people use AI chatbots to find information, getting your videos cited by these systems can drive serious traffic to your channel.

But here’s the thing: AI models don’t “watch” videos the way humans do. They read text. This means you need to think differently about how you create and optimize your YouTube content if you want AI chatbots to find and cite it.

What Do AI Models Actually Read: Metadata or Transcripts?

This is the million-dollar question. The answer? Both, but transcripts matter more.

How ChatGPT Accesses YouTube Content

ChatGPT can’t directly watch YouTube videos. Instead, it reads the text that comes with your video. When you provide ChatGPT with a video transcript or when it accesses YouTube through web browsing, it analyzes the transcript to understand what your video is about.

According to recent analysis, ChatGPT processes video transcripts and metadata when available. This means your video’s transcript is like a script that AI models read to understand your content.

How Google AI Overviews Uses YouTube

Google AI Overviews works differently. It’s built on the same system as Google Search, which means it can access YouTube transcripts, captions, and structured data that Google has already indexed. According to industry research, Google’s AI Overviews rely heavily on indexed video transcripts and captions when creating summaries.

This is important: Google indexes your video’s transcript automatically if you have captions enabled. If you don’t have captions, Google may try to generate them automatically, but the quality won’t be as good as ones you create yourself.

Why Transcripts Beat Metadata

Think of it this way: your video’s title and description (metadata) are like a book cover. They tell AI models what your video might be about. But the transcript is like the actual book. It tells AI models exactly what you said, what topics you covered, and what information you provided.

When someone asks ChatGPT “How do I change a tire?” it searches through transcripts to find videos that actually explain tire changing. A video with a great title but a poor transcript won’t rank as well as a video with a good transcript that clearly explains the process.

How Do I Make My YouTube Videos More Likely to Be Cited?

Now that you know AI models read transcripts, here are the specific actions you should take to improve your chances of getting cited by ChatGPT, AI Overviews, and other AI chatbots:

1. Always Add Accurate Captions

This is the most important step. Without captions, AI models can’t read your video content properly. Here’s what to do:

• Enable auto-captions, then edit them: YouTube’s auto-captions are a good start, but they make mistakes. Always review and fix errors, especially technical terms, names, and numbers.
• Use proper punctuation: AI models understand content better when sentences are properly punctuated. Add periods, commas, and question marks where they belong.
• Break up long sentences: If you speak in long run-on sentences, break them into shorter, clearer sentences in your captions.
• Include speaker names: If multiple people speak, label who’s talking. This helps AI models understand context.

2. Write Detailed Video Descriptions

Your video description is like metadata that helps AI models understand your content before they read the transcript. According to YouTube SEO best practices, your description should:

• Include your main keywords in the first 100 characters: This is what AI models see first, so make it count.
• Write a clear summary: Explain what your video covers in 2-3 sentences. Use the words people would use when asking an AI chatbot.
• Add timestamps for longer videos: If your video covers multiple topics, add timestamps. This helps AI models understand the structure of your content.
• Include related keywords naturally: Don’t stuff keywords, but naturally include terms people might search for.

3. Optimize Your Video Titles

Your title is the first thing AI models see. Make it clear and descriptive. According to YouTube’s latest features, you can now test multiple titles to see which performs better. Here’s what works:

• Use question formats: Titles like “How Do I Change a Tire?” match how people ask AI chatbots questions.
• Be specific: “How to Change a Tire on a 2020 Honda Civic” is better than “Car Tips” because it matches specific queries.
• Include numbers when relevant: “5 Ways to Improve Your Credit Score” helps AI models understand you’re providing a list.
• Avoid clickbait: AI models prefer titles that accurately describe content. If your title promises something your video doesn’t deliver, AI models will notice.

4. Structure Your Content Clearly

AI models understand structured content better than rambling conversations. Here’s how to structure your videos:

• Start with a clear introduction: In the first 30 seconds, explain what your video covers. Say it out loud so it’s in your transcript.
• Use clear section breaks: When you move to a new topic, say “Now let’s talk about…” This creates natural breaks in your transcript.
• Summarize key points: At the end, recap the main points. This reinforces important information in your transcript.
• Answer questions directly: If your video answers “How do I…”, make sure you actually explain the steps clearly in your speech.

5. Use Relevant Tags and Hashtags

Tags and hashtags help YouTube and AI models categorize your content. According to YouTube SEO research, you should:

• Use 2-3 hashtags in your title or description: Don’t overdo it. Too many hashtags look spammy.
• Tag with specific keywords: Use tags that match what people would ask an AI chatbot. “How to change tire” is better than just “car”.
• Mix broad and specific tags: Include both general topics (like “automotive”) and specific ones (like “tire changing tutorial”).

6. Create Playlists Around Topics

Organizing videos into playlists helps AI models understand that your content is part of a larger topic. According to best practices, playlists improve how YouTube and AI models understand your content structure.

For example, if you create multiple videos about car maintenance, put them in a “Car Maintenance Guide” playlist. This signals to AI models that you have comprehensive content on this topic.

What Specific Actions Should I Take for ChatGPT?

ChatGPT uses web browsing to access YouTube content. Here’s what works best:

• Focus on educational content: ChatGPT tends to cite videos that clearly explain how to do something or answer specific questions.
• Use clear, direct language in your transcript: Avoid slang and jargon unless you explain it. ChatGPT prefers clear explanations.
• Cite your sources in the video: If you mention statistics or facts, say where they came from. ChatGPT values content that references authoritative sources.
• Create content that answers common questions: Think about what people ask ChatGPT and create videos that answer those exact questions.

What About Google AI Overviews?

Google AI Overviews works differently because it’s built on Google Search. Here’s what to focus on:

• Optimize for Google Search first: Since AI Overviews uses Google’s index, videos that rank well in Google Search are more likely to appear in AI Overviews.
• Use schema markup if possible: If you have a website, add video schema markup. This helps Google understand your video content better.
• Focus on E-E-A-T: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness matter. Show your credentials, cite sources, and demonstrate expertise in your videos.
• Create comprehensive content: Google AI Overviews prefers content that thoroughly covers a topic rather than quick tips.

What About Other AI Chatbots?

Different AI chatbots work differently, but the same principles apply:

• Perplexity: Tends to cite sources more explicitly. Make sure your video title and description clearly state what your video covers.
• Claude: Values well-structured, detailed content. Focus on clear explanations and comprehensive coverage.
• Gemini: Google’s other AI model, so it uses similar indexing as AI Overviews. Follow the same strategies.
• Copilot: Microsoft’s AI uses Bing’s index. Optimize for Bing search as well as YouTube.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Here are mistakes that hurt your chances of getting cited:

• Relying only on auto-captions: Auto-captions have errors. Always review and fix them.
• Vague titles and descriptions: “Cool Video” doesn’t help AI models understand your content. Be specific.
• Rambling without structure: If your transcript is just you talking without clear points, AI models won’t understand your content well.
• Ignoring keywords people actually use: Use the words your audience uses when asking questions, not industry jargon.
• Not updating old videos: If you have popular videos with poor captions, fix them. Old content can still get cited.

How Do I Know If My Videos Are Getting Cited?

Tracking AI citations is tricky because AI models don’t always show where they got information. However, you can:

• Check your YouTube Analytics: Look for traffic sources you don’t recognize. Some AI-driven traffic may show up as direct or referral traffic.
• Use AI visibility tools: Tools like Spotlight track when your content gets cited by AI chatbots across multiple platforms.
• Monitor search trends: If your video topics suddenly get more search volume, it might be because AI chatbots are citing similar content.
• Test with AI chatbots: Ask ChatGPT or other AI models questions your video answers and see if they mention your video or similar content.

Getting Started: Your Action Plan

Ready to optimize your YouTube content for AI citations? Here’s a simple action plan:

• Audit your existing videos: Check which videos have captions and which don’t. Start by adding accurate captions to your most popular videos.
• Improve your top 10 videos: Update titles, descriptions, and captions for your best-performing content first.
• Create a caption workflow: For every new video, create and upload accurate captions before publishing.
• Optimize descriptions: Rewrite your video descriptions to be more specific and keyword-rich.
• Test and measure: Use tools to track if your optimization efforts are working.

Remember: getting cited by AI chatbots isn’t about gaming the system. It’s about creating clear, helpful content that AI models can understand and recommend. Focus on making your transcripts accurate, your descriptions clear, and your content valuable. The citations will follow.

Frequently Asked Questions

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) both reward sources that LLMs can parse quickly and cite with confidence. That makes readability—how effortlessly a human or model can process your prose—a core ranking signal, not just a UX nicety.

What We Mean by Readability

Readability looks at how easy it is to understand your words. The Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level is the clearest score for most editors. It mixes average sentence length and syllables per word, then tells you the school grade needed to read the passage without effort.

When a paragraph lands between grade 6 and grade 8, most readers can scan it fast, and LLMs can pull exact quotes with less hallucination.

LLMs Prefer Grade Levels 6–8

That band is plain enough for skimmers yet still sounds authoritative. GEO and AEO engines reward that mix because it keeps answer chunks tight and well supported.

Example: One Insight, Four Readability Levels

The base idea: “Marketing teams should tune GEO landing pages for clarity because LLMs cite concise sources first.” Here’s how it reads at four levels.

Notice how the core meaning survives, but only the middle-school version keeps authority and speed. That is why Spotlight’s data ties the grade 6–8 band to the most GEO/AEO wins.

Check your content readability grade in seconds →

Research That Links Readability to Performance

• Comprehension improves when you lower barriers. A controlled study in the Journal of Education and Learning found that simplified sentences cut reading time by 20% while improving recall scores among undergraduates (ERIC).
• Users vote with their scroll. Aggregated web data shows content scoring above 70 on the Flesch Reading Ease scale drives up to 40% higher engagement and is preferred by 90% of surveyed readers (WiFi Talents).
• LLMs echo the same bias. Yoast’s GEO testing observed that prompts surfaced shorter sentences, direct verbs, and one idea per paragraph more consistently (Yoast).
• Spotlight’s LLM panel agrees. Across 18,000 monitored prompts, Spotlight’s internal dataset shows pages written at a Flesch score of 60–75 (roughly 7th–9th grade) were cited 31% more often than denser peers covering the same topic set.

The takeaway: write like a guide, not a textbook. The same tone that helps readers stay engaged also keeps LLM snippets intact.

Operational Best Practices

• Engineer for scannability. Target 15–18 words per sentence, cap paragraphs at three sentences, and surface claims in lead sentences so LLMs can quote without trimming.
• Use semantic hierarchy. Maintain H2/H3 ladders, descriptive list labels, and data callouts (tables, pull-quotes) so models can spot structured facts.
• Connect evidence inline. Cite statistics or studies in the same sentence; retrieval models often extract contiguous text spans.
• Localize jargon. Define proprietary terms the first time you use them so readers and models share context.

How to Measure Your Readability

• Flesch–Kincaid (Word, Google Docs). Quickly surfaces grade level and reading ease directly inside your editor.
• Gunning Fog & SMOG calculators. Helpful checkpoints for enterprise or regulatory copy where compliance demands specific education levels.
• Hemingway Editor. Flags dense sentences, passive constructions, and adverbs that commonly trip LLM summarizers.
• Yoast Readability Analysis. Bundled into many WordPress builds and tuned for paragraph balance.
• Spotlight’s free Readability Scoring Tool. Paste any URL or draft and instantly see Flesch, grade level, and AI-ready recommendations—no login required.

Putting Spotlight’s Scanner to Work

Run every GEO asset through Spotlight’s free readability tool before publication. Pair the score with our LLM visibility dashboard to see whether incremental edits—shorter sentences, clarified claims, reordered bullet points—move the citation needle. Teams typically iterate from a Flesch 52 to 68 in one edit cycle, and we’ve observed a parallel lift in Perplexity and ChatGPT citations within two crawl windows.

Key Takeaways

• Readability is the bridge between subject expertise and LLM comprehension.
• Peer-reviewed studies and third-party benchmarks converge on the 60–75 Flesch band as the engagement sweet spot.
• Spotlight data shows the same band drives a 31% lift in GEO/AEO citations.
• Consistent scoring (via Spotlight’s tool) lets you institutionalize “LLM-ready” guidelines across every content pod.

Keep writing like an expert, but package the insight like a teacher. That’s how you earn the human trust signals and machine citations that GEO and AEO now demand.

We sent the same prompt to all three Gemini-based chatbots:

“What are the best coffee machines for beginners?”

Below are the brands mentioned in the responses:

The Data Behind the Divergence

This coffee machine example isn’t an outlier—it’s representative of a systematic pattern we discovered across over 360,000 responses. Our analysis reveals three distinct “personalities” in how these Gemini variants select and present brands:

1. Citation Behavior: The Great Divide

The coffee machine example highlights a fundamental difference in sourcing:

• Gemini: Often relies on training data without external citations
• AI Overviews: Selective, high-quality sources (3 sources in coffee example)
• AI Mode: Extensive citation (14 sources in coffee example, averaging 49.4 citations per response)

Across all queries, AI Mode cites nearly 2.5x more sources per response than AI Overviews (49.4 vs 18.1 average citations). This suggests AI Mode is optimized for thorough research, while AIO prioritizes curated, authoritative sources.

2. Brand List Comprehensiveness

Just like in the coffee example, the three models consistently differ in how many brands they include:

• Complex queries (tech tools, SaaS):
  • AI Mode: 13-20 brands per response
  • Gemini: 11-19 brands per response
  • AI Overviews: 4-12 brands per response (most selective)
• Simple queries (consumer products):
  • AI Overviews: Often just 1-2 brands (like the 3 in coffee example)
  • AI Mode: Typically 2-4 brands
  • Gemini: Usually 4+ brands

3. Brand Overlap Analysis

When analyzing prompts answered by all three models, we found surprisingly low overlap:

Even for identical prompts, 30-70% of brand mentions are unique to each model. This means a brand could be cited by one Gemini variant while being completely absent from the others.

4. Content Type Preferences Influence Brand Selection

The sources each model prefers directly impact which brands they mention:

• AI Mode: Heavy preference for blog content (20.44% of citations), editorial articles (19.97%), and guides (17.49%). This explains why AI Mode found brands like Zojirushi and Bodum—they appear frequently in editorial roundups and buying guides.
• AI Overviews: Highest blog preference (23.61% of citations), favoring authoritative consumer sites like Food & Wine in the coffee example.
• Gemini: Strong preference for homepages (13.78%) and product pages (11.32%), suggesting direct brand website visibility matters more.

Why This Happens: Three Different Optimization Strategies

These differences aren’t bugs—they’re features. Each interface is optimized for different use cases:

AI Mode: The Thorough Researcher

• Goal: Comprehensive, well-sourced information
• Approach: Extensive citations (49.4 per response), longer answers (2,807 avg characters)
• Brand Selection: Includes niche players, emerging brands, regulatory entities
• Best For: Users wanting detailed comparisons and exhaustive lists

AI Overviews: The Curated Summary

• Goal: Quick, authoritative answers
• Approach: Selective citations (18.1 per response), concise answers (831 avg characters)
• Brand Selection: Market leaders only, often just 1-3 brands
• Best For: Users wanting fast answers from trusted sources

Gemini: The Balanced Guide

• Goal: Comprehensive but accessible information
• Approach: Moderate citations (21.5 per response), balanced answers (2,399 avg characters)
• Brand Selection: Mix of leaders and alternatives, often includes platform extensions
• Best For: Users wanting thorough but digestible recommendations

Strategic Implications for Brands

The coffee machine example reveals a critical truth: being visible in one Gemini interface doesn’t guarantee visibility in the others. Here’s what brands need to know:

1. Target the Right Interface for Your Goals

• Want broad coverage? Optimize for Gemini—it has the highest brand mention rate (28.50%) and includes diverse options.
• Want to be the “go-to” choice? Focus on AI Overviews—its selectivity means being mentioned makes you the default recommendation.
• Want to reach niche audiences? Target AI Mode—it includes emerging brands and specialized options others miss.

2. Content Strategy Must Match Citation Patterns

The coffee machine sources reveal what each model values:

• AI Mode sources: Editorial roundups (CNET, Wirecutter, Serious Eats), retail product pages (Best Buy), Reddit communities
• AI Overviews sources: Authority sites (Food & Wine), Reddit discussions, YouTube
• Gemini sources: Often none—relies on training data, making brand website SEO critical

Recommendation: Get featured in editorial buying guides and product roundups. Both AI Mode and AI Overviews heavily cite these formats. For Gemini, focus on brand website optimization since it may not cite external sources.

3. Brand Positioning Matters

Notice in the coffee example:

• AI Overviews focused on espresso machines (3 brands, all espresso-focused)
• AI Mode included drip brewers, French presses, and single-serve (8 brands, diverse brewing methods)
• Gemini balanced both but emphasized premium options (Technivorm, Fellow)

How you position your brand—premium vs. budget, specialty vs. general-purpose—determines which interface will include you.

4. Don’t Rely on Training Data Alone

Gemini’s zero citations in the coffee example shows it relies heavily on training data. However, AI Mode and AI Overviews prioritize recent, real-time sources. Brands need both:

• Long-term: Strong brand presence in training data (brand awareness, content volume)
• Short-term: Current citations in authoritative sources (press coverage, reviews, guides)

Case Study: Contact Data Tools Query

To illustrate the pattern extends beyond consumer products, here’s another example from our analysis:

Prompt: “Tools for enriching contact data, which ones exist?”

Conclusion: One Model, Three Realities

Methodology: This analysis is based on 367,903 responses across Gemini, AI Overviews (AIO), and AI Mode, collected through Spotlight’s AI visibility monitoring platform. The coffee machine example was captured on October 30, 2024, for a US-based query. Brand overlap analysis examined prompts answered by all three models, calculating consensus rates and unique mentions per interface.

The Universal Content Preferences

Our analysis reveals that LLMs have remarkably consistent preferences when it comes to content types. Here’s what we found across all models:

LLM-Specific Content Preferences

Content Characteristics That Matter Most

Based on our analysis of 1,684 source analyses from Gemini 2.0 Flash, here are the content characteristics that appear most frequently in LLM-cited content:

The Content Depth Sweet Spot

Our analysis reveals that LLMs prefer content that’s neither too shallow nor too deep:

Only 4.28% of cited content is classified as “in-depth,” while 5.29% is “surface-level.” This suggests that LLMs prefer content that provides substantial information without being overwhelming.

Visual Content: The Universal Language

Visual content appears to be the most consistent preference across all LLMs:

• 95.13% of cited content contains images
• 10.45% contains videos
• 78.80% has some form of visual data

The average cited content contains 9.3 sections and 83 paragraphs, with an average length of 2,820 characters.

Domain Preferences by LLM

Each LLM shows distinct domain preferences that reflect their training and purpose:

Practical Implications for Content Creators

Based on this analysis, here’s what content creators should focus on to improve their chances of being cited by LLMs:

1. Visual Content Strategy

• Include images in 95%+ of your content
• Consider adding videos to 10%+ of content
• Ensure visual elements support and enhance the text

2. Content Structure

• Use bullet points and lists extensively (90%+ of content)
• Organize content into clear sections (average 9.3 sections)
• Keep paragraphs manageable (average 83 paragraphs per piece)

3. Authority and Credibility

• Showcase author credentials and expertise
• Include empirical evidence when possible
• Cite sources and provide evidence

4. Content Depth

• Aim for “moderate” depth – comprehensive but not overwhelming
• Target 2,000-3,000 characters per piece
• Balance thoroughness with accessibility

5. Platform-Specific Optimization

• For ChatGPT: Focus on authoritative, well-sourced content similar to Wikipedia
• For Perplexity: Create engaging, social-friendly content that sparks discussion
• For Gemini: Optimize for Google’s ecosystem and services
• For Claude: Consider UK-focused content and financial services
• For Copilot: Focus on e-commerce and product-related content

This analysis is based on data from Spotlight’s database, which tracks LLM citations across multiple AI models. The data represents real-world citation patterns from over 1.2 million analyzed links.